Women have flashed it through the ages because men are turned on by it. Fetish model Wonderhussy stated in her blog that she had performed in belly button fetish videos in which she laid back and played with her belly button, poking her finger in it and stretching it out.
Sometimes literary works focusing on navels or which sexually symbolize navels can also act as stimuli to navel fetishists.
It looks smaller on my computer, and it's really a huge pain. The upper limit of four lines is crippling for long messages and especially for people who are visually handicapped and need to use big fonts and/or a bigger input field.
The only reason I can see that this was implemented is because of a mistake. As much as this new feature annoys the hell out of me, I can see how it might be useful to people using small screens and/or low resolutions.
At that point if you want to lick her feet or suck her toes, just do it. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out -because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Also, I don't think it's necessarily a fetish to like a woman with pretty feet, I think it's only a fetish if it's an obsession. I joked around with a couple girls one weekend, saying I loved their feet and **** to see what kind of reaction I would get. Years ago when I was 17 I was with a few girls and I told the one (Who was in sandals) that I liked feet. Pretty feet have this sensual sexual delicate attractiveness that you would never understand. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -because I was not a Jew.
Also women dressed in low-rise clothing like jeans, shorts etc., that reveals the navel is also considered sexually arousing.but i've told a few girls that i only talk to on AIM from myspace, and they don't seem to have a problem with it. I would enjoy massaging them but its not like I cant get it up with normal means. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -because I was not a Jew.With 2.4.0, the input field in the chat window is automatically sized to some degree rather than be arrangeable by the user.Problem is, it's very restrictive as the size doesn't scale up to what many were accustomed to using in 2.3 when editing large messages (code, for example), and there's no option to disable it.To me, this is a usability regression from 2.3, however, ticket #4962 considering this a bug was closed invalid, so I'm entering this as an enhancement.