The conclusions that are drawn from the evidence are often and have often been very much exaggerated to fit personal beliefs and biases.Yes, even scientists have biases and favorite theories.Based on analysis of the footfall impressions "The Laetoli Footprints" provided convincing evidence for the theory of bipedalism in Pliocene hominins and received significant recognition by scientists and the public.Since 1998, paleontological expeditions have continued under the leadership of Dr.Analysis of the footprints and skeletal structure showed clear evidence that bipedalism preceded enlarged brains in hominins.Taking isolated similarities by themselves, the theory of evolution appears to be quite reasonable... However, it seems that too much weight has been placed on similarities without questioning the differences.
Although the hominid fossil record is far from complete, and the evidence is often fragmentary, there is enough to give a good outline of the evolutionary history of humans.
There was discussion of the risks of damage to the unique fossils, and other museums preferred to display casts of the fossil assembly.
Laetoli is a site in Tanzania, dated to the Plio-Pleistocene and famous for its hominin footprints, preserved in volcanic ash.
To the embarrassment of many a very intelligent man and woman of science, overly confident conclusions and arrogant statements have been made based on such similarities that have, on occasion, turned out to be not only wrong, but painfully wrong.
It is fine to hypothesize that similarities between different creatures are the result of common ancestry, but since such similarities have been and are often conflicting when compared with other features, it might be prudent to hold back a little when making conclusions about any sort of definite taxonomic classification model or even relationship.